compiled by

YaReally Archive


Shallow

Original Link

via Rational Male

The Shocker
on November 20th, 2012 at 2:58 pm
Original Link

human beings had sex before books = mind blown

(human beings played attraction games before english too playas)

I love really smart girls who act girly. Like, I like to be calling girls ‘little bunny’ within 20 minutes and have them take off their shoes and sit on my lap, it’s so much better when they comply and participate in becoming my toy. This works best on really smart girls who aren’t nerd oriented, like talking about books or putting up intellectual convo blockers. I guess a lot of rocks for brains guys would call a girl like that ‘dumb,’ clueless fucks.

“I just want to play with youuuu, I want to sit across the table when i take you out and just look at youuu,” drunken singsongy bullshit that’s so fun gets you both horny and doesn’t work on girls who want to talk about the finer points of wittgenstein.


Mid-Life Crisis

Original Link

via Rational Male

The Shocker
on November 19th, 2012 at 6:14 pm
Original Link

The Shocker
on November 19th, 2012 at 8:00 pm
Original Link

hahahahaha i just came up with the greatest neg ever. When a girl adds you on facebook, ‘like’ a picture of her from YEARS ago back when she was younger and hotter lol


The Shocker
on November 20th, 2012 at 2:17 am
Original Link

Wtf are you talking about dont be on facebook are you all fucking troglodytes. Female echo chamber wtf. You go on facebook to check out body shots of girls you meet to make sure they’re hot. Accept friend request, look for bikini pics. Tell girls thats how you use facebook. You can whip out your phone in a bar while you’re talking to a girl and say, hey add me real quick i want to see a bikini pic of you, i cant tell if you’re hot. Female echo chamber hahaha r your balls female handwarming devices Lol


Case Study – Inspire Her

Original Link

via Rational Male

The Shocker
on November 14th, 2012 at 3:26 pm
Original Link

All of your game is shit… how do you peolpe get laid.

The only thing I’m seeing here is push/pull game:
Disinterest, challenge, ignoring, one-word = push
Affirmation (awesome pic!) = pull

Push/Pull is game 101.. it’s stasis. Push/pull only goes so far to building attraction, you’re sending exactly one signal by demonstrating disinterest = you are not a fawning beta. That’s it. It does not signal that you are alpha, it kicks the bucket so you can do that later. If you can’t use a titty pic to build your alpha, then you aren’t one. Alpha’s have fun. Alpha’s can enjoy a titty pic.

Girls can tell when you’re over-reliant on push/pull. If you push/pull where there should be, you know, normal interaction then it’s a red flag. She’ll sense you are not a match. Her soulmate wouldn’t push/pull.

There are optimal times to be terse/one-word. A girl is coming over with her friends, she texts “should we pick up some vodka?” Response, “lol.” It’s teasing, dismissive, and amusedly lets her know she faux pas’d. A friend visited for a hilarious, epic weekend, and being the group’s hipster/artsy one, told me she was writing a short story about it and asked if I would read it when she posts it online. Response, ‘Probably.’ Of course I’m going to read it, but it’s funny/cool to TEASE.

But that’s not what being alpha is about. Alpha is about being the funniest guy in the room- you can’t signal/fake that. The smartest one, the most charismatic. It’s about being the dominant one in your group of friends and beyond. Did you all lose sight of this? This is what the original The Game was all about, recreating those types of interactions again and again- not this ultra-distilled version of assholery (this isn’t even real asshole stuff, btw, real asshole stuff is kicking the girl to the curb after you’ve fucked her because she wasn’t that good in bed, that’s what girls mean by assholes. Not this weak pre-hookup jerk signaling bullshit.)

Y’all misinterpreting the spirit of disinterest anyway. Disinterest isn’t a tool to achieve some creepy goal (like more pics). Girls can tell when you have an agenda. When you’re being cool but trying to get a date, then you’re not cool. You’re pretending to be cool to achieve your creepy goal. Real disinterest, or low interest, is extremely effective in attracting girls. Your frame and demeanor will be, you know, normal. You’re not trying to get laid, which is HUGE. You can be in bed with a naked girl trying to get it in and she’ll be turned off by how badly you want it. Same thing for trying to score dates, build rapport and attract- the things you say and do to try and get a reaction from her will turn her off. Being icy = being normal.

You don’t overreach and therefore make mistakes, but you don’t kill the interaction by being a one-word weirdo.

Finally, for some positivity, the correct response when you don’t have rapport yet (and this is incomplete because I’m still working on it), is TEASING. She’s teasing you with a pic, it’s not an end-to-itself. Tease her back.


All In

Original Link

via Rational Male

The Shocker
on November 12th, 2012 at 1:01 pm
Original Link

Amazingly, Petraeus was one of my alpha heroes! I read a profile years ago on Petraeus and his rat pack fraternity entourage of GI Joe’s- he had a core group of green beret’d, hard-partying professionals around him 24/7. I mean Petraeus and his guys would be in a presidential suite in Baghdad one day turning military strategy on its head and running a war- and that night they’d be getting blasted in a pub in Berlin after flying there in a black ops plane. Petraeus operated like a one man wrecking ball the world over and he had this ultra macho crew that basically had VIP status on planet earth- not to mention access to any tech toy, spy shit, etc. When you think of Kant’s superman on earth, these guys were it- Patton, James Bond and Capt’n America all wrapped up in one. I don’t think he had the wrong ‘alpha education’ for second. Dunno what went wrong.


System Failure

Original Link

via Rational Male

The Shocker
on November 7th, 2012 at 2:26 pm
Original Link

:+:+:++:+:+::+

Thank fucking god.

I commend you for keeping Rational apolitical- while I believe divorce laws should be restructured, this debate does not need the conservative narrative but can be won on the the basis of equity alone. It attracts a crowd who are counter-productive to the game discussion- just look at the shithole that Chateau’s peanut gallery has become.

I say thank god because I have written 5-10 comments over at Heartiste’s (my gateway to blogs like yours) which contradict his narrative that have all been modded. I have written 2-3 other posts not under the Shocker pseudonym that point out the clear and present flaws in his more political posts that have also been modded. It is for this reason I have stopped commenting and participating on his site (except in the rare instances where my ego demands a larger audience). I do not see people like me with actual game being replaced.

~~~~~

Here is my take on Minter’s manifesto.

First, I think it’s a major misrepresentation to say women voted one way and men another and that this is the major demographic trend. While true in aggregate, you have to look at the difference between rural and urban, where the majority of urban men also favored democrats in large numbers. There is a major difference in culture, education and lifestyles between men in red counties and blue counties, and it’s wrong to say men voted one way just because the rural population is larger.

Second, I do not think the demographic trends of certain groups voting one way or another are permanent, though they are hardening unless Republicans adapt. It is Republican hubris to think they can bungle their messaging to each group and still expect a victory:
Women – Rape, birth control, abortion, etc.
Hispanics – Not welcome until we need you.
Asians – WASPS flip-flop, lie and are bad people.
Republicans tried to destroy Obama on Bengazi and his crisis messaging. While unfounded (http://patriotslog.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/patriotslog-apology/), it shows they understand if you can throw negative messaging about your opponent to a voting bloc and have it stick, you win. They tried for four years. So for them to tank themselves by sticking their middle finger up to key voting demographics and dig massive holes for themselves is the height of idiocy.

These aren’t permanent trends as long as the right adapts. It’s simple marketing and they have to react. It’s a great time to be a latino in the republican party. And look at Christie- the next Republican candidate who positions himself as bipartisan will be seen as the great uniter and will win in a landslide.

It’s marketing, image is everything. Obama honored Michelle all the time. Romney’s wife is blonde. Romney is robotic, seen as a liar- women are more sensitive to things like this. Romney is mormon, in his 60′s- not sexy. My point here is that these are not permanent trends. A majority of women will gladly vote republican if the messaging and marketing are right. It’s not that hard.

I would support an Elizabeth Warren presidency- she is the only serious champion of consumer protections in the senate. As the financial situation for this country worsens, I think Democrats will adjust spending accordingly. We’ll see. Republicans want to lop all the spending off in one go- I’m actually okay with both visions for this country as they’re win-win for me. Democrats would keep the economy chugging along as cutting deficit spending would crash the economy, while the lower taxes from Republicans would be a win for my family. Entitlements have grown at a far slower pace than the conservative narrative would have us believe, and ultimately it doesn’t matter as neither financial policy are rooted in fiscal reality (like the rest of the world today).

The supremacy of the white male, or at least that narrative, was never at play. 32-ish percent of voters were registered Republicans. We can assume a smaller percentage of that group are even aware of the underlying patriarchal social ideology. It’s a fantasy that isn’t relevant anymore, hasn’t been for years– anyone who champions it in righty-friendly game blogs is clueless. I have yet to see a single person tout the conservative narrative in a serious manner who is also worthy of respect- it’s chock full of logical fallacies and false premises. Like when Minter says, oh no, women are using men as ‘forms of recreation.’ Hello. Where are we right now. Game blog. It’s like hooded wasps in a KKK lodge saying blacks are racist.

Within game world, there’s some weird recent trend to support conservative family values because then betas would be able to actually get laid. It’s so dumb- you hate on fatties and low SMV women all fucking day, but when it comes to beta men they deserve to have society changed to benefit them. Fatties’ problems can be solved by going to the gym- Hey, so can betas. Neither group deserve sympathy. It’s a huge mistake to start aligning men’s rights with the losing conservative platform. It’s all marketing, remember, if men’s rights are seen as beta rights then we lose.