compiled by

YaReally Archive

Exposing The ‘Women Never Lie About Rape’ Myth

Original Link

via Heartiste

on December 15, 2014 at 4:46 pm
Original Link

We need to insist on the presumption of innocence and guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If it is simply her word against his with no other evidence such as physical trauma, then there should be no conviction.

  • Ripp
    on December 16, 2014 at 12:35 am
    Original Link

    Physical evidence and a man’s “word” are dismissed by law enforcement in general at the onset of a rape accusation.

    A disgusting horid truth it is. A woman can simply cry rape (literally) to law enforcement and a man will be arrested, put in jail and booked on felony rape charges without any questioning of the merit of the accusations.

    The burden is then put on the man to hire a lawyer and work the system backwards. The falsely accused will suffer financial and social hardship and the lying cunt and cops have no recourse.

    It’s safer for cops to do this as the system is rigged to passively disregard the truth in favor of any socio-political backlash a cop or LE agency might receive for questioning a “rape claim”.

    • Ripp
      on December 16, 2014 at 12:57 am
      Original Link

      Even more disgusting is the process to charge FRA cunts. The cops have to have “evidence” that the bitch knowlingly and purposely made a false criminal accusation with the intent to harm the falsely accused. Very hard to prove.

      No cop wants to be the lead investigator going after some slut to hammer the truth out of her when it’ll end up with a never ending spew of “I was confused I didn’t understand I’m going through some stuff etc. Etc. ”

      The core driver of all of this, as CH describes above, is the Regret Rape syndrome.

      A more severe manifestation of the common “that didn’t count” or “I was just drunk” or “I don’t usually do this” type of hamstering.

      In PUA syntax it’s the ASD (anti slut defense) continuum.

      I “date” (heh) many women and almost every year I’m dealing with crazy ass bitches- and fuck yes I have quick point and shoot cameras around (multi purpose for security and other activities).

      Its saved me twice now with crazy bitches lying to cops. Here is the most bullshit part: caught a bitch breaking into my house on camera (I was home)…called cops, cops wouldn’t believe me even though window was broken and heal marks on my leather couch…then I showed them the video. They still wouldn’t arrest her. Cited her and released. I sent the video to evidence and called police chief to make sure they would send video to DA. They didnt. All charges dropped.

      Gentlemen the deck is stacked against us. Cameras are cheap, protect yourself.

Comment Of The Week: The Psychotic Left

Original Link

via Heartiste

Pijama Wearing Ninja
on December 14, 2014 at 11:33 am
Original Link

My big comment disappeared, yay. CH, I don’t really believe your educated guess because evolution doesn’t work that fast. Swedes mocked Louis Armstrong when he was there on tour and that was an attitude towards blacks openly endorsed by people at the time. My grandparents have/had the same attitude, despite people my age not having it. My grandmother would routinely comment about how ugly some black football player is despite me finding it offensive to say that despite agreeing with her at times.

I used to be the ‘racism is bad’ kind of person and I did have to twist what I believe was just and moral in my head due to it. Maybe the outbreeding of NW Europeans makes them predisposed to feel more charitable to outgroups, but I don’t think it explains this, unless diversity close to them is an epigenetic trigger of sorts.

  • Pluviophile
    on December 14, 2014 at 12:33 pm
    Original Link

    My haplogroup is i1 (although I have an admixture of various European ethnicities). This puts me at great risk as it relates to the expression of leftist hysteria. However, I was raised around vibrant diversity. I grew up on the periphery of a ghetto and attended all black schools elementary through high school; with one exception, I was the only cracker on my Pop Warner football teams; in fact, I work in downtown Miami which puts me in the middle of more diversity … and, yet, after all these years, I still don’t feel enriched.

    In truth I feel alienated, a stranger in my own home, defensive and always prepared for confrontation. This is no way to live, but it’s exactly what leftists need to experience to rid them of their psychological cancer. It’s easy to preach diversity from a gated Whitopia, not so much when centered in a seething brown and black mass.

    And I feel a little bad writing that because I do know some good black and brown people, some of whom I consider friends, but even so, my affection for these good folks is of no consequence.

    The fact remains that diversity, at its core, is an unhealthy way to organize society.

    • Ripp
      on December 15, 2014 at 12:25 am
      Original Link

      “The fact remains that diversity, at its core, is an unhealthy way to organize society.”


      Underscoring the CH truthism: diversity +(in) proximity = war(confrontation).

      The deluded altrusitic affection for diversity-advocating by the left is anchored by:

      1) confirmation bias by describing a sprinkle of isolated incidents they personally experienced where Shaneekwuh and José who they observed we’re nice or once did something positive. This hasty generalization is then applied in the aggregate as pseudo-truth.

      2) No practical experience living and/or making a living in black-brown dominated environments over a significant time span.

      3.1) J3w hollywood / media content control of blasting feel good diversity fantasies 24×7.

      3.2) suppression of empirical fact based conclusions, and the demonization of those who publish the information in easily readable formats.

      Anyone can pull crime data or demographic information these days; however the eye’s of the leftard (and many rightard) masses will gloss over and they’ll begin yawning (read: unable to comprehend) at raw data tables to make intelligent decisions on their own.

      The cancer is deep.

  • PA
    on December 14, 2014 at 12:52 pm
    Original Link

    More about friendship. In a college lit seminar we discussed “A Passage to India,” a novel about the waning days of British colonial rule in India. The book’s protagonist was a liberal Englishman who was friends with an Indian doctor. The Englishman’s gestures of friendship were sincere and generous, but the Indian eventually told him “we cannot be friends until the English leave India.”

    The discussion we had in that seminar centered around power relations and colonialism blah blah blah.

    Well, I did find a solid nugget of truth in that scene. As I just said in my earlier comment, friendship is a partnership of equals. It may be difficult, if not in a practical sense impossible, for a White man and a Black man to be friends in an anti-White America.

    • Ripp
      on December 15, 2014 at 12:46 am
      Original Link

      My comment above is in mod- but basically I say the same.

      Those that advocate the diversification of blacks and browns haven’t lived/worked with them for any significant duration.

on December 14, 2014 at 7:04 pm
Original Link

You can destroy an engine by revving it without a load. Strange, but true, an engine can rev to 5,000 rpm under load and survive… 5,000 rpm without a load — it falls apart.

Which largely describes the female mind. Millennia of evolution have crafted a brain that can’t not be tasked.

Quite literally, idleness has been bred out. Slothful mothers don’t have off spring — or — if they do — that generation will be childless. (This category also includes mothers so neurotic that they ‘medicate’ themselves into passivity — booze, drugs, or both.)

(I’ve seen PLENTY of the latter.)


The male is totally different critter. ‘Idleness’ for a man is often his most productive time.

The extreme examples:

Einstein famously slept (12-15 hours/day) and strolled (interminable bucolic walks) his way through life. He related that all of his best work was done while in solitude — if not in the transitory state between sleep and waking.

Newton was just as bad.

General MacArthur famously slept through the Inchon bombardment. His battleship was firing its big guns at the time!

One could go on endlessly

Spectacular intellectual achievements require a state of relaxed composure — Zen, if you will.

This male-only tick comes from the ancient hunt. Like MacArthur, our universal ancestors had to totally shut up, stay relaxed — yet alert, to bag the really big, dangerous prey from a hide/ camouflage.

Persistence hunting does not work with mammoths, bears, aurochs. They only run towards you. { This ancient contest is echoed in Spanish bull-fighting. }

At the time of the attack, one must break loose and use maximum exertion — while at peak risk. Upon success, one can kick back and talk shop/ the hunt.

This male-only tick is replicated during the sex act. For it is the male who reaches peak intensity — never the female.

Unwittingly, every man, with every thrust, is communicating to his mate his hunting virility. This hits her limbic brain.

If you’ve witnessed enough pr0n you know that at the final stages, the female is always reduced to a quivering, dripping, bump target. (Yes, it’s not just your lovers.)

And, of course, there are endless battle accounts of men spontaneously creaming in their pants upon victory/ battle survival. Surviving a bullet festival is a highly arousing event. This aspect of battle is excised from most historical accounts — which are directed at teen males, anyway.


This is the yin yang of humanity.

She slaves on as the heart and stomach of humanity — holding body and soul together — creating the next generation.

He risks all as the mind and vision of humanity — protecting and expanding the human space against all threats — while bringing home the bacon.

Equal, they are not.

Female culture is always drivel. For they are wired to talk to and understand babbling infants. Female social experimentation quickly devolves to having no children. Hence the complete absence of successful matriarchies.

(Though these are commonly seen in Africa: elephants, lions, …)

  • Ripp
    on December 15, 2014 at 1:06 am
    Original Link

    Great comment well done.

Eliezer Ben Yehuda
on December 14, 2014 at 11:29 pm
Original Link

OT question: will Ryan Duffin soon be benefiting from pre-selection?

  • Ripp
    on December 15, 2014 at 12:52 am
    Original Link

    And pictues of J law, the star of hunger games, whose vagina and boobs are easily accessible by anyone with innawebz…

    • Ripp
      on December 15, 2014 at 1:10 am
      Original Link

      Meant for the hunger comment above…

      …although jamming my thumb up j law’s asshole does make me kinda hungry…

How To Spot A Charming Loverboy

Original Link

via Heartiste

on December 12, 2014 at 1:33 am
Original Link

“The few BPD chicks I’ve dated were, without exception, perpetually late and lived in clutter boxes. I knew early on that women who had no interest in keeping up their homes (however humble square-footage-wise) and who preened constantly while simultaneously fretting about their looks (without justification) were basketcases who fucked like champion mares and who would be gone from my life, of their accord or mine, within six months. It’s funny how these female archetypes are universally recognizable. Special little snowflakes, my ass.”

100% accurate with my experiences as well.

We award these women with the Purple Saguaro of Slurtitude.

White Male Pussy Of The Month: Anderson Cooper

Original Link

via Heartiste

on December 10, 2014 at 12:50 pm
Original Link

i want to introduce some of my buddies to the chateau….anyone have some good screening questions i can ask them to see if they would react positively or negatively to the site?

remember most men havent been introduced to the idea of game, nevermind the idea of a whole red pill worldview. many would react negatively to protect their ego

  • ballz deep
    on December 10, 2014 at 1:38 pm
    Original Link

    “i want to introduce some of my buddies to the chateau”

    you’re not morpheus. you can’t offer someone the red pill

    “most of these people are not ready to be unplugged”

    a man needs to sense something is wrong search and take the red pill on his own

    • Ripp
      on December 11, 2014 at 2:37 am
      Original Link

      Best and most effective time to do this is when your beta friend gets demoralized by an LTR breakup.

      And as a linear problem solving man he’ll yearn for truth: and Chateau Heartiste has it.

      Challenge is the trurh is very hard to accept for most men; even men that are successful and intelligent.

      The truth that they’ll learn here will force them to come to terms with their own weaknesses. This will pang the ego-defense, fear will materialize when it’s recognised they’ll have to make very hard behavioral changes.

      And unless they can put their ego aside and LEARN truth, they’ll inevitably revert to the ‘easier’ blue pill rationalizations like NAWALT and repeat the same relationship cycles.

      I’m very selective of who I introduce to CH.

      What has absolutely worked in force feeding the red pill to these types of subjects is their observation of my field proof. When these men see me with high smv women consistently over a long time period and I offer them the gem of CH and it’s due credit, they’re locked into an ultimatum of either accepting the change they must make or accepting that they’re a fucking pussy and can’t hack it.